X WORKFLOW GUIDE
Adapt a price-comparison ad with Hypit: phone-stand workflow
A practical workflow based on Cell’s demonstration: structure, product evidence, three tests, controlled variations and version-by-version review.
Edited by HypitAI · Reviewed
Watch the comparison, outputs and workflow
The video combines the reference, a Chinese phone-stand version, presenter and language variants, and a live script edit.
Open full video details →Extract responsibilities, not content
The demonstration retains a low-versus-high price conflict, three tests and a use-case choice while rebuilding the presenter, products, Chinese script and visuals.
| Section | Structural job | Prepare again |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | Establish two price points | Real models, current prices and review date |
| Tests 1–3 | Compare one difference at a time | Repeatable methods, footage and evidence |
| Close-ups | Make differences visible | Permitted product shots and accurate labels |
| Close | Choose by use case | Conditions, audience and accurate CTA |
Build a product-evidence sheet first
Every price and performance statement needs a source or test record.
- Record full model names, price sources and review dates.
- Define conditions, actions, results and limits for each test.
- Use comparable real product footage instead of generated visuals as proof.
- List prohibited unsupported claims.
A reviewable agent instruction
Request a structure and missing-input report before generation.
/hypit clone this video: [authorised reference]
Goal: a 9:16 phone-stand price comparison.
Keep the price conflict, three tests, close-ups and use-case choice.
Replace presenter, products, full script, voice, visuals, captions and result board.
Evidence: [models and price sources] [test records] [permitted conclusions].
Assets: [product footage] [presenter reference] [brand rules].
First return the shot structure, evidence/asset map, missing inputs, services and budget. Do not start paid generation.Change one variable group at a time
Keep a baseline and export presenter, result-board and language variations separately.
| Variation | Reuse | Recheck |
|---|---|---|
| Presenter | Product footage and test order | Identity, voice, references and lip sync |
| Result board | Script and shot roles | Every score, rank and supporting evidence |
| Language | Facts and product footage | Translation, pronunciation, safe area and duration |
Review in four passes
Play once with sound, once muted, once audio-only and once against the evidence sheet. Record exact timestamps and reasons for every revision.
Keep creator metrics separate
Reference views, speed and demonstration outcomes belong to the source post. Use only substantiated figures in your own ad, and never present a concept video as real product testing.